State v. David
552 P.2d 272, 26 Or. App. 359
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedAugust 2, 1976
DocketNo. C 75-09-2796 Cr, CA 5628
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 552 P.2d 272 (State v. David) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. David, 552 P.2d 272, 26 Or. App. 359 (Or. Ct. App. 1976).
Opinion
Counsel have stipulated:
"It appearing to counsel for appellant and respondent herein that defendant-appellant’s sentence as a dangerous offender is erroneous, in that the judgment order herein imposes an additional sentence for being a dangerous offender, instead of enhancing the sentence for the underlying offense:
"IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between counsel for appellant and respondent that the judgment herein should be vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing.”
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. David
561 P.2d 189 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1977)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
552 P.2d 272, 26 Or. App. 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-david-orctapp-1976.