State v. David L. Hathaway
This text of State v. David L. Hathaway (State v. David L. Hathaway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
AT NASHVILLE FILED FEBRUARY 1998 SESSION July 2, 1998
Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Court Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE ) ) NO. 01C01-9703-CR-00094 Appellee ) ) PICKETT COUNTY v. ) ) HON. JOHN A. TURNBULL DAVID L. HATHAWAY ) ) (D.U.I.) Appellant. ) )
CONCURRING OPINION
I concur in the result reached by Judge Barker in his thorough opinion.
Having concurred with Judge Wade in his opinion in State v. Jerry Wayne Edison, No.
03C01-9605-CC-00199 (Tenn. Crim. App., Knoxville, June 18, 1997) that an abuse of
discretion standard applies to this court’s review of the trial court’s ruling on the
admissibility of intoximeter results, I write separately to indicate that I favor the Edison
standard of review as opposed to the standard of preponderance of the evidence to which
Judge Barker adheres in this case. I agree that the trial court’s decision would be
affirmed under either standard of review.
_________________________ CURWOOD WITT
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. David L. Hathaway, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-david-l-hathaway-tenncrimapp-1997.