State v. Daugaard

634 A.2d 298, 228 Conn. 905, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 388
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 4, 1993·No. SC 14859·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 32 Conn. App. 483 (AC 10709), is granted, limited to the following issues:

[906] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14859. Decided November 4, 1993 Brian S. Carlow, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. John A. East III, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
“1. Whether the Appellate Court was correct in concluding that the timing of the disclosure of the police report during the trial did not violate the defendant’s due process rights?
“2. Whether the Appellate Court was correct in determining that the erroneous admission by the trial court of testimony detailing the defendant’s invocation of various constitutional rights was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Daugaard, 634 A.2d 298, 228 Conn. 905, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 388 (Colo. 1993).

634 A.2d 298 (State v. Daugaard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Daugaard
647 A.2d 342 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)