State v. Daugaard
634 A.2d 298, 228 Conn. 905, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 388
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 32 Conn. App. 483 (AC 10709), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Whether the Appellate Court was correct in concluding that the timing of the disclosure of the police report during the trial did not violate the defendant’s due process rights?
“2. Whether the Appellate Court was correct in determining that the erroneous admission by the trial court of testimony detailing the defendant’s invocation of various constitutional rights was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Daugaard, 634 A.2d 298, 228 Conn. 905, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 388 (Colo. 1993).
634 A.2d 298 (State v. Daugaard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Daugaard
647 A.2d 342 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)