State v. Daugaard
634 A.2d 298, 228 Conn. 905, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 388
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedNovember 4, 1993
DocketSC 14859
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 634 A.2d 298 (State v. Daugaard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Daugaard, 634 A.2d 298, 228 Conn. 905, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 388 (Colo. 1993).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 32 Conn. App. 483 (AC 10709), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Whether the Appellate Court was correct in concluding that the timing of the disclosure of the police report during the trial did not violate the defendant’s due process rights?
“2. Whether the Appellate Court was correct in determining that the erroneous admission by the trial court of testimony detailing the defendant’s invocation of various constitutional rights was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Daugaard
647 A.2d 342 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
634 A.2d 298, 228 Conn. 905, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-daugaard-conn-1993.