State v. Dartez

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Dartez

23 So. 334, 50 La. Ann. 322, 1898 La. LEXIS 449

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 7, 1898

DocketNo. 12,708

StatusPublished

This text of 23 So. 334 (State v. Dartez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Dartez, 23 So. 334, 50 La. Ann. 322, 1898 La. LEXIS 449 (La. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Blanchard, J.

The accused was indicted for petit larceny, convicted and sentenced to two years at hard labor.

He appeals, and urges as error the refusal of the trial judge to quash the indictment on motion to that effect made.

The ease is identical with that of State vs. Desire Hebert, Jr., and Laodiee Landry, appealed at the same time from the same parish, being No. 12,710 on the docket of this court, and decided at the same sitting of this court. See 50 An. —.

The facts of the two cases are exactly similar, and the law governing them the same.

For the reasons assigned in the Hebert and Landry case, the judgment appealed from herein is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI