State v. Darrow

39 La. Ann. 677
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 15, 1887·No. No. 9979·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Todd, J.

The defendant appeals from a sentence of one year’s [678] imprisonment at hard labor, having been convicted of inflicting a wound less than mayhem.

Iiis only complaint here is that the trial judge refused to grant him a new trial. The motion, therefore, was founded on the separating of the jury after retiring to deliberate upon their verdict.

It suffices to say that no bill of exceptions was taken to the overruling of the motion. In the absence of such bill, containing the evidence or a statement of facts upon which the judge based his ruling, this Court is powerless to review the matter. State vs. Wire, 38 Ann. 685.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Darrow, 39 La. Ann. 677 (La. 1887).

39 La. Ann. 677 (State v. Darrow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Craig
104 So. 744 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1925)
New Orleans Ry. & Light Co. v. Lavergne
70 So. 921 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1916)
State v. Napoleon
104 La. 164 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1900)
State v. Powers
52 La. Ann. 1254 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1900)