State v. Darrell Oneil Boston
This text of State v. Darrell Oneil Boston (State v. Darrell Oneil Boston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
The State, Respondent,
v.
Darell Oneil Boston, Petitioner.
Appellate Case No. 2021-000549
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Appeal from Charleston County R. Markley Dennis Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Opinion No. 28137 Heard December 13, 2022 – Filed March 1, 2023
CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
David Nelson Lyon, of Duff, Freeman, Lyon, and Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, both of Columbia, for Petitioner.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, and Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of Charleston, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: We granted a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in State v. Boston, 433 S.C. 177, 857 S.E.2d 27 (Ct. App. 2021). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.1
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.
1 Counsel for Petitioner handled this appeal as part of the Appellate Practice Project. We applaud the professional ability of counsel and admire his willingness to volunteer his time and efforts in representing Petitioner.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Darrell Oneil Boston, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-darrell-oneil-boston-sc-2023.