State v. Darcy
20 A. 319, 52 N.J.L. 222, 23 Vroom 222, 1889 N.J. LEXIS 3
This text of 20 A. 319 (State v. Darcy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Darcy, 20 A. 319, 52 N.J.L. 222, 23 Vroom 222, 1889 N.J. LEXIS 3 (N.J. 1889).
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed,, for the reasons given by that court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Knapp, Magie, Yan Syckel, Brown, Clement, Cole, McGregor, Smith, Whitaker. 13.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Duke Power Co. v. Hillsborough Township
26 A.2d 713 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1942)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
20 A. 319, 52 N.J.L. 222, 23 Vroom 222, 1889 N.J. LEXIS 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-darcy-nj-1889.