State v. Darby

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Darby

511 A.2d 666, 103 N.J. 493, 1986 N.J. LEXIS 1169

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedMarch 25, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 511 A.2d 666 (State v. Darby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Darby, 511 A.2d 666, 103 N.J. 493, 1986 N.J. LEXIS 1169 (N.J. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition for certification granted, limited solely to the defendant’s sixth amendment claim that his right to counsel was violated by the post-indictment interrogation of defendant by representatives of the prosecutor. See, Comment to Rule of Professional Conduct 3.8, citing United States v. Callabrass, 458 F.Supp. 964 (S.D.N.Y.1978). The matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division for its consideration of this issue.

Jurisdiction is not retained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for certification granted, limited solely to the defendant’s sixth amendment claim that his right to counsel was violated by the post-indictment interrogation of defendant by representatives of the prosecutor. See, Comment to Rule of Professional Conduct 3.8, citing United States v. Callabrass, 458 F.Supp. 964 (S.D.N.Y.1978). The matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division for its consideration of this issue.

Jurisdiction is not retained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

511 A.2d 666, 103 N.J. 493, 1986 N.J. LEXIS 1169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-darby-nj-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack