State v. Dantzson

226 S.W.3d 174, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 834, 2007 WL 1598165
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 5, 2007·No. ED 87906·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Edward Dantzson (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of first-degree assault and armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no instructional error. State v. Belton, 153 S.W.3d 307, 310 (Mo.banc 2005). We also find there was sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror might have found Appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Christian, 184 S.W.3d 597, 602 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our deci *175 sion to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Dantzson, 226 S.W.3d 174, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 834, 2007 WL 1598165 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

226 S.W.3d 174 (State v. Dantzson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dantzson v. State
285 S.W.3d 823 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)