State v. Danny's Franchise Systems, Inc.
This text of 519 N.E.2d 618 (State v. Danny's Franchise Systems, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion by defendant Matlin for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion by defendants Danny’s Franchise Systems, Inc., et al., for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely and upon the further ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
519 N.E.2d 618, 70 N.Y.2d 940, 524 N.Y.S.2d 672, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dannys-franchise-systems-inc-ny-1988.