State v. Dankert

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Dankert

293 So. 2d 377, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7624

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 19, 1974

DocketNo. 73-764

StatusPublished

This text of 293 So. 2d 377 (State v. Dankert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Dankert, 293 So. 2d 377, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7624 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court quashed a search warrant and the tangible evidence seized under the warrant upon a finding that the affidavit upon which the warrant was issued failed to show probable cause. While some of the facts set forth in the affidavit might have been insufficient to prove guilt, or for that matter might have been inadmissible for that purpose, nonetheless, we conclude respectfully that the factual allegations in toto were sufficient to meet the acceptable and well defined standards of probable cause. See, Suiero v. State, Fla. App.1971, 248 So.2d 219.

The order granting the motion to quash the search warrant and suppress the evidence is reversed and this cause remanded for further proceedings.

OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court quashed a search warrant and the tangible evidence seized under the warrant upon a finding that the affidavit upon which the warrant was issued failed to show probable cause. While some of the facts set forth in the affidavit might have been insufficient to prove guilt, or for that matter might have been inadmissible for that purpose, nonetheless, we conclude respectfully that the factual allegations in toto were sufficient to meet the acceptable and well defined standards of probable cause. See, Suiero v. State, Fla. App.1971, 248 So.2d 219.

The order granting the motion to quash the search warrant and suppress the evidence is reversed and this cause remanded for further proceedings.

OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 So. 2d 377, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dankert-fladistctapp-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack