State v. Daniels

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Daniels

241 S.W.3d 864, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 5, 2008 WL 34807

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 2, 2008

DocketWD 66983

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 241 S.W.3d 864 (State v. Daniels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Daniels, 241 S.W.3d 864, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 5, 2008 WL 34807 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Myron Daniels appeals his conviction of second degree trafficking, section 195.223, RSMo 2000, and possession of a controlled substance, section 195.202, RSMo 2000. Daniels argues that the State did not provide sufficient evidence for the jury to find beyond a reasonable doubt that he “possessed” a controlled substance. Based on our review of the record and the applicable law, we affirm Daniels’ convictions. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Myron Daniels appeals his conviction of second degree trafficking, section 195.223, RSMo 2000, and possession of a controlled substance, section 195.202, RSMo 2000. Daniels argues that the State did not provide sufficient evidence for the jury to find beyond a reasonable doubt that he “possessed” a controlled substance. Based on our review of the record and the applicable law, we affirm Daniels’ convictions. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 S.W.3d 864, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 5, 2008 WL 34807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-daniels-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack