State v. Daniels

891 So. 2d 1202, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 879, 2005 WL 236058
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 2, 2005·No. No. 4D04-1523·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals an order suppressing statements made by appellee defendant to the police, both at his residence and later at the police station. The trial court granted the motion because the court found that the statements were made while defendant was being detained without probable cause. There is ample evidence in the record to support this finding, and we accordingly affirm. State v. C.F., 798 So.2d 751 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

POLEN, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Daniels, 891 So. 2d 1202, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 879, 2005 WL 236058 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

891 So. 2d 1202 (State v. Daniels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hill v. Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles
891 So. 2d 1202 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)