State v. Daniels

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Daniels

891 So. 2d 1202, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 879, 2005 WL 236058

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 2, 2005

DocketNo. 4D04-1523

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 891 So. 2d 1202 (State v. Daniels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Daniels, 891 So. 2d 1202, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 879, 2005 WL 236058 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals an order suppressing statements made by appellee defendant to the police, both at his residence and later at the police station. The trial court granted the motion because the court found that the statements were made while defendant was being detained without probable cause. There is ample evidence in the record to support this finding, and we accordingly affirm. State v. C.F., 798 So.2d 751 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

POLEN, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals an order suppressing statements made by appellee defendant to the police, both at his residence and later at the police station. The trial court granted the motion because the court found that the statements were made while defendant was being detained without probable cause. There is ample evidence in the record to support this finding, and we accordingly affirm. State v. C.F., 798 So.2d 751 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

POLEN, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

891 So. 2d 1202, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 879, 2005 WL 236058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-daniels-fladistctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack