State v. Daniels

Connecticut Appellate Court

State v. Daniels

621 A.2d 329, 30 Conn. App. 917, 1993 Conn. App. LEXIS 138

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedMarch 16, 1993

Docket11512

StatusPublished

This text of 621 A.2d 329 (State v. Daniels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Daniels, 621 A.2d 329, 30 Conn. App. 917, 1993 Conn. App. LEXIS 138 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction of one count of failure to display lights in violation of General Statutes § 14-96a (a) and one count of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of General Statutes § 14-227a. The defendant’s conviction followed a conditional plea of nolo contendere pursuant to General Statutes § 54-94a, reserving the right to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress “any and all fruits of his arrest on August 16, 1989.”

After thorough review of the record, transcripts and briefs in this matter, and affording the appropriate scope of review to the defendant’s claims, we find them to be without merit.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction of one count of failure to display lights in violation of General Statutes § 14-96a (a) and one count of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of General Statutes § 14-227a. The defendant’s conviction followed a conditional plea of nolo contendere pursuant to General Statutes § 54-94a, reserving the right to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress “any and all fruits of his arrest on August 16, 1989.”

After thorough review of the record, transcripts and briefs in this matter, and affording the appropriate scope of review to the defendant’s claims, we find them to be without merit.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

621 A.2d 329, 30 Conn. App. 917, 1993 Conn. App. LEXIS 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-daniels-connappct-1993.