State v. Daniel

820 P.2d 901, 109 Or. App. 680, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1688
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 13, 1991·No. 89-09-4706-C; CA A64415·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals the imposition of restitution of $355.70 after his conviction for endangering the welfare of a minor. ORS 163.575.1 We vacate the order of restitution and remand for resentencing.

After a bench trial, the court found that defendant and a woman had engaged in sexual conduct in the presence of the woman’s 11-month old child. The court ordered defendant to pay $355.70 as restitution to Holy Rosary Medical Center for its expenses in examining the woman after her sexual contact with defendant.

Defendant argues that Holy Rosary could not recover restitution. The state concedes that point,2 and we accept the concession.

Conviction affirmed; restitution order vacated; remanded for resentencing.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Daniel, 820 P.2d 901, 109 Or. App. 680, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1688 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).

820 P.2d 901 (State v. Daniel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. White
439 P.3d 569 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2019)
State v. Flajole
129 P.3d 770 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2006)