State v. Daniel

820 P.2d 901, 109 Or. App. 680, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1688
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedNovember 13, 1991
Docket89-09-4706-C; CA A64415
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 820 P.2d 901 (State v. Daniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Daniel, 820 P.2d 901, 109 Or. App. 680, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1688 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals the imposition of restitution of $355.70 after his conviction for endangering the welfare of a minor. ORS 163.575.1 We vacate the order of restitution and remand for resentencing.

After a bench trial, the court found that defendant and a woman had engaged in sexual conduct in the presence of the woman’s 11-month old child. The court ordered defendant to pay $355.70 as restitution to Holy Rosary Medical Center for its expenses in examining the woman after her sexual contact with defendant.

Defendant argues that Holy Rosary could not recover restitution. The state concedes that point,2 and we accept the concession.

Conviction affirmed; restitution order vacated; remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. White
439 P.3d 569 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2019)
State v. Flajole
129 P.3d 770 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
820 P.2d 901, 109 Or. App. 680, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-daniel-orctapp-1991.