State v. Daniel OO.

995 N.E.2d 849, 21 N.Y.3d 1038, 972 N.Y.S.2d 533, 2013 NY Slip Op 83675, 2013 WL 4563514, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 2117
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 29, 2013
StatusPublished

This text of 995 N.E.2d 849 (State v. Daniel OO.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Daniel OO., 995 N.E.2d 849, 21 N.Y.3d 1038, 972 N.Y.S.2d 533, 2013 NY Slip Op 83675, 2013 WL 4563514, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 2117 (N.Y. 2013).

Opinion

[1039]*1039Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the stipulation and order of Supreme Court is not a final judgment within the meaning of the Constitution and CPLR 5601 (d) because the Mental Hygiene Law article 10 application was withdrawn without prejudice to renewal in the event of certain conditions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
995 N.E.2d 849, 21 N.Y.3d 1038, 972 N.Y.S.2d 533, 2013 NY Slip Op 83675, 2013 WL 4563514, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 2117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-daniel-oo-ny-2013.