State v. Daniel

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Daniel

402 S.W.3d 160, 2013 WL 3229697, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 766

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 25, 2013·No. No. ED 98350·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cedric Daniel (“Defendant”), appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of one count of robbery in the second degree, in violation of Section 569.030 RSMo 2000.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the record on appeal. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cedric Daniel (“Defendant”), appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of one count of robbery in the second degree, in violation of Section 569.030 RSMo 2000.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the record on appeal. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25.

State v. Daniel, 402 S.W.3d 160, 2013 WL 3229697, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 766 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

402 S.W.3d 160 (State v. Daniel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.