State v. Dangler

92 N.E.3d 876, 2018 Ohio 723, 152 Ohio St. 3d 1404
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 28, 2018·No. 2017–1703·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

On review of an order a certifying conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are ordered to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals' decision filed November 7, 2017. "During a plea hearing, does the failure of the sentencing court to inform a defendant of all of the penalties associated with a sex offender classification imposed by R.C. Chapter 2950 constitute a complete failure to comply with Crim.R. 11 and render the plea void without the need to show prejudice resulted?"

The conflict cases are State v. Creed, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 97317, 2012-Ohio-2627, and State v. Young, 2d Dist. Greene No. 2013-CA-22, 2014-Ohio-2213.

It is ordered by the court that the clerk shall issue an order for the transmittal of the record from the court of appeals for Williams County. O'Connor, C.J., and DeWine, J., would hold the cause for the decision in 2017-0891, State v. Kouts.

French and Fischer, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Dangler, 92 N.E.3d 876, 2018 Ohio 723, 152 Ohio St. 3d 1404 (Ohio 2018).

92 N.E.3d 876 (State v. Dangler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. King
2025 Ohio 1365 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2025)
State v. Anderson
2019 Ohio 1915 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
State v. Wallace
2019 Ohio 1005 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)