State v. Danforth

Supreme Court of Vermont

State v. Danforth

62 Vt. 188

CourtSupreme Court of Vermont

DecidedJanuary 15, 1890

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 62 Vt. 188 (State v. Danforth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Danforth, 62 Vt. 188 (Vt. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

[190]*190The opinion of the court was delivered by

Tyler, J.

The act of furnishing intoxicating liquor by the respondent, which the State’s evidence tended to prove, was in violation of the statute, R. L. s. 3800, unless done in a private dwelling or its dependency. It was incumbent upon the respondent to show affirmatively that the act fell within this .exception to the general prohibition of the law. State v. Freeman, 27 Vt. 523; State v. Norton, 45 Vt. 258.

We find no error, therefore there must be judgment and sentence on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[190]*190The opinion of the court was delivered by

Tyler, J.

The act of furnishing intoxicating liquor by the respondent, which the State’s evidence tended to prove, was in violation of the statute, R. L. s. 3800, unless done in a private dwelling or its dependency. It was incumbent upon the respondent to show affirmatively that the act fell within this .exception to the general prohibition of the law. State v. Freeman, 27 Vt. 523; State v. Norton, 45 Vt. 258.

We find no error, therefore there must be judgment and sentence on the verdict.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 Vt. 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-danforth-vt-1890.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack