State v. Dandy

3 S.C.L. 395
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided April 15, 1804·Published

Opinion

By the court.

The indictment is absurd. It is impossible that the defendant could be guilty of the offence as charged.

Judgment arvested.

Present, Grimke, Waties, Johnson, Trezevant, and Brevard, Justices ; Bay, J. absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Dandy, 3 S.C.L. 395 (S.C. 1804).

3 S.C.L. 395 (State v. Dandy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.