State v. Dandy

3 S.C.L. 395
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedApril 15, 1804
StatusPublished

This text of 3 S.C.L. 395 (State v. Dandy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Dandy, 3 S.C.L. 395 (S.C. 1804).

Opinion

By the court.

The indictment is absurd. It is impossible that the defendant could be guilty of the offence as charged.

Judgment arvested.

Present, Grimke, Waties, Johnson, Trezevant, and Brevard, Justices ; Bay, J. absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 S.C.L. 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dandy-sc-1804.