State v. Dana

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. Dana

548 A.2d 1390, 1988 Me. LEXIS 257

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided October 21, 1988·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

The State appeals pursuant to 15 M.R.S. A. § 2115-A(1) (1979) from an order of the Superior Court (Washington County, Sils-by, J.) suppressing the results of a breath test administered to defendant because of the failure of a police officer to appear as a witness at the time of hearing. We find no abuse of discretion on the facts set forth in this record. See State v. Mason, 408 A.2d 1269, 1272 (Me.1979).

The entry is:

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

The State appeals pursuant to 15 M.R.S. A. § 2115-A(1) (1979) from an order of the Superior Court (Washington County, Sils-by, J.) suppressing the results of a breath test administered to defendant because of the failure of a police officer to appear as a witness at the time of hearing. We find no abuse of discretion on the facts set forth in this record. See State v. Mason, 408 A.2d 1269, 1272 (Me.1979).

The entry is:

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

All concurring.

State v. Dana, 548 A.2d 1390, 1988 Me. LEXIS 257 (Me. 1988).

Pincite

548 A.2d 1390 (State v. Dana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related