State v. Dana
This text of 548 A.2d 1390 (State v. Dana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
The State appeals pursuant to 15 M.R.S. A. § 2115-A(1) (1979) from an order of the Superior Court (Washington County, Sils-by, J.) suppressing the results of a breath test administered to defendant because of the failure of a police officer to appear as a witness at the time of hearing. We find no abuse of discretion on the facts set forth in this record. See State v. Mason, 408 A.2d 1269, 1272 (Me.1979).
The entry is:
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
548 A.2d 1390, 1988 Me. LEXIS 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dana-me-1988.