State v. Damous

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Damous

226 S.W.3d 900, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 970, 2007 WL 1814439

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 26, 2007

DocketNo. ED 88544

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 226 S.W.3d 900 (State v. Damous) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Damous, 226 S.W.3d 900, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 970, 2007 WL 1814439 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Casey Damous (“Defendant”) appeals from his conviction of sexual misconduct in the first degree. In his sole point on appeal, Defendant contends that the trial court erred in admitting the evidence that the victim identified Defendant at the police station and also in admitting her in-court identification of Defendant.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI