State v. Dais

207 S.E.2d 758, 285 N.C. 664, 1974 N.C. LEXIS 1101
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedAugust 30, 1974
StatusPublished

This text of 207 S.E.2d 758 (State v. Dais) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Dais, 207 S.E.2d 758, 285 N.C. 664, 1974 N.C. LEXIS 1101 (N.C. 1974).

Opinion

207 S.E.2d 758 (1974)
285 N.C. 664

STATE of North Carolina
v.
Franklin W. DAIS.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 30, 1974.

Herbert B. Hulse, George F. Taylor, for the defendant.

Robert Morgan, Atty. Gen, Thomas M. Ringer, Jr., Associate Atty, for the State.

Petition of defendant for writ of certiorari to the North Carolina Court of Appeals to review its decision, 206 S.E.2d 759. Denied. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question. Allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Dais
206 S.E.2d 759 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
207 S.E.2d 758, 285 N.C. 664, 1974 N.C. LEXIS 1101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dais-nc-1974.