State v. Daigle

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. Daigle

539 A.2d 206, 1988 Me. LEXIS 78

DecidedMarch 18, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 539 A.2d 206 (State v. Daigle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Daigle, 539 A.2d 206, 1988 Me. LEXIS 78 (Me. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

In this prosecution for operating while under the influence, 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-B (Supp.1987), the District Court (Bangor) ordered suppression of all evidence acquired as a result of a police officer’s stop of an automobile driven by Donald Daigle on Indian Island on June 13, 1987. Contrary to the State’s contention on its direct appeal pursuant to 15 M.R.S.A. § 2115-A(1) (1980), the record before us does not establish any reversible error on the part of the motion judge in either finding the facts or applying the law.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

In this prosecution for operating while under the influence, 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-B (Supp.1987), the District Court (Bangor) ordered suppression of all evidence acquired as a result of a police officer’s stop of an automobile driven by Donald Daigle on Indian Island on June 13, 1987. Contrary to the State’s contention on its direct appeal pursuant to 15 M.R.S.A. § 2115-A(1) (1980), the record before us does not establish any reversible error on the part of the motion judge in either finding the facts or applying the law.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

539 A.2d 206, 1988 Me. LEXIS 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-daigle-me-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack