State v. D. U.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. D. U.

280 P.3d 402, 250 Or. App. 382, 2012 WL 2029844, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 720

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided June 6, 2012·No. 110362221; A148282·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals a judgment committing him to the Mental Health Division for treatment for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. The trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and is unable to provide for his basic personal needs. The state concedes that the record lacks clear and convincing evidence that defendant’s mental illness causes him to be unable to provide for his basic personal needs. We find the state’s concession to be well founded and accept it.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals a judgment committing him to the Mental Health Division for treatment for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. The trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and is unable to provide for his basic personal needs. The state concedes that the record lacks clear and convincing evidence that defendant’s mental illness causes him to be unable to provide for his basic personal needs. We find the state’s concession to be well founded and accept it.

Reversed.

State v. D. U., 280 P.3d 402, 250 Or. App. 382, 2012 WL 2029844, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 720 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

280 P.3d 402 (State v. D. U.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related