State v. D. S.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. D. S.

174 P.3d 1091, 217 Or. App. 394, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1844

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedDecember 26, 2007

Docket060666068; A132893

StatusPublished

This text of 174 P.3d 1091 (State v. D. S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. D. S., 174 P.3d 1091, 217 Or. App. 394, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1844 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this involuntary mental commitment case, appellant contends that the evidence in the record is legally insufficient to establish that he is dangerous to himself because of his mental disorder. ORS 426.005(l)(d)(A). The state concedes that the record does not provide clear and convincing evidence to prove the grounds for his commitment. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this involuntary mental commitment case, appellant contends that the evidence in the record is legally insufficient to establish that he is dangerous to himself because of his mental disorder. ORS 426.005(l)(d)(A). The state concedes that the record does not provide clear and convincing evidence to prove the grounds for his commitment. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 P.3d 1091, 217 Or. App. 394, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-d-s-orctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack