State v. D. R.
This text of 157 P.3d 260 (State v. D. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals a judgment committing him to the Mental Health Division for treatment for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. The trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and is unable to provide for his basic personal needs. A discussion of the facts would be of no benefit to the bench and bar. The state concedes that the record lacks clear and convincing evidence that defendant’s mental illness causes him to be unable to provide for his basic personal needs. We find the state’s concession to be well-founded and accept it.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 P.3d 260, 212 Or. App. 141, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-d-r-orctapp-2007.