State v. D. R. B.
This text of 298 P.3d 639 (State v. D. R. B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of the trial court’s judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. In his second assignment of error, he contends that the trial court erred in concluding that he is a danger to others as a result of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s judgment should be reversed.1 We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse on that basis. Accordingly, we do not address appellant’s first and third assignments of error.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
298 P.3d 639, 255 Or. App. 740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-d-r-b-orctapp-2013.