State v. D. R. B.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. D. R. B.

162 P.3d 381, 214 Or. App. 149, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 976

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJuly 11, 2007

Docket060767596; A133129

StatusPublished

This text of 162 P.3d 381 (State v. D. R. B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. D. R. B., 162 P.3d 381, 214 Or. App. 149, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 976 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the trial court erred in finding that, because of a mental disorder, he is either dangerous to himself or presently unable to provide for his own basic needs. ORS 426.005(l)(d). He contends that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the court’s order of commitment. The state concedes the point. On de novo review, we agree and accept the concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the trial court erred in finding that, because of a mental disorder, he is either dangerous to himself or presently unable to provide for his own basic needs. ORS 426.005(l)(d). He contends that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the court’s order of commitment. The state concedes the point. On de novo review, we agree and accept the concession.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 P.3d 381, 214 Or. App. 149, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-d-r-b-orctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack