State v. D. K.

335 P.3d 317, 265 Or. App. 334, 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 1201
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided September 4, 2014·No. 134205; A156070·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her for a period not to exceed 180 days pursuant to ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that, contrary to the trial court’s ruling, the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is a danger to herself and unable to provide for her basic needs because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(e)(A), (B). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient for involuntary commitment under either basis and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.1

Reversed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. D. K., 335 P.3d 317, 265 Or. App. 334, 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 1201 (Or. Ct. App. 2014).

335 P.3d 317 (State v. D. K.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 426.130
Oregon § 426.130
§ 426.005
Oregon § 426.005