State v. D. J. B.

234 P.3d 149, 235 Or. App. 693, 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 649
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJune 16, 2010
Docket300814507; A139424
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 234 P.3d 149 (State v. D. J. B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. D. J. B., 234 P.3d 149, 235 Or. App. 693, 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 649 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of the trial court’s judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant contends that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is a danger to herself or others as the result of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1). The state concedes that the record lacks clear and convincing evidence to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s judgment should be reversed. On de novo review,1 we agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. DJB
234 P.3d 149 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 P.3d 149, 235 Or. App. 693, 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-d-j-b-orctapp-2010.