State v. D. J. B.

234 P.3d 149, 235 Or. App. 693, 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 649
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided June 16, 2010·No. 300814507; A139424·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of the trial court’s judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant contends that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is a danger to herself or others as the result of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1). The state concedes that the record lacks clear and convincing evidence to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s judgment should be reversed. On de novo review,1 we agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. D. J. B., 234 P.3d 149, 235 Or. App. 693, 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 649 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).

234 P.3d 149 (State v. D. J. B.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. DJB
234 P.3d 149 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2010)