State v. D. B. T.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. D. B. T.

150 P.3d 1070, 210 Or. App. 460, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 7

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJanuary 3, 2007

Docket0507-67673; A129713

StatusPublished

This text of 150 P.3d 1070 (State v. D. B. T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. D. B. T., 150 P.3d 1070, 210 Or. App. 460, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 7 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the evidence in the record is insufficient to establish that, because of a mental disorder, he is presently a danger to himself or others or is unable to provide for his basic personal needs. ORS 426.130. The state concedes that the evidence does not establish the grounds for the order of commitment that was entered in this case. On de novo review, we agree and accept the concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the evidence in the record is insufficient to establish that, because of a mental disorder, he is presently a danger to himself or others or is unable to provide for his basic personal needs. ORS 426.130. The state concedes that the evidence does not establish the grounds for the order of commitment that was entered in this case. On de novo review, we agree and accept the concession.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 P.3d 1070, 210 Or. App. 460, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-d-b-t-orctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack