State v. D. B. L.
This text of 361 P.3d 612 (State v. D. B. L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of an order committing him for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in concluding that, as a result of a mental disorder, he is unable to provide for his basic personal needs and is not receiving such care as is necessary for his health or safety. See ORS 426.005(l)(f)(B). The state concedes that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s order should be reversed. We agree and accept the state’s concession.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
361 P.3d 612, 274 Or. App. 573, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 1262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-d-b-l-orctapp-2015.