State v. C.W.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. C.W.

662 So. 2d 768, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11965, 1995 WL 676079

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 15, 1995

DocketNo. 95-0035

StatusPublished

This text of 662 So. 2d 768 (State v. C.W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. C.W., 662 So. 2d 768, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11965, 1995 WL 676079 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sua sponte, we dismiss this appeal by the state from the final order denying Defendant’s restitution in a juvenile proceeding. Although the criminal statutes now provide the state may appeal an order denying restitution under section 775.089, see § 924.07(l)(k), Fla.Stat. (1993), enacted effective October 1, 1993, ch. 93-37, § 14, at 206, Laws of Fla., there is no comparable provision in sections 39.069(l)(b) and 39.0711, Florida Statutes (1993), which list the types of orders from which the state may appeal in juvenile proceedings. The holding of State v. MacLeod, 600 So.2d 1096, 1098 (Fla.1992), that the failure to order restitution does not constitute an illegal sentence, precludes jurisdiction under section 39.069(l)(b)5, which allows the state to appeal the disposition in a juvenile proceeding on the ground that it is illegal. None of the other grounds apply. Consequently, this court has no jurisdiction to consider the instant appeal.

GLICKSTEIN, STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Sua sponte, we dismiss this appeal by the state from the final order denying Defendant’s restitution in a juvenile proceeding. Although the criminal statutes now provide the state may appeal an order denying restitution under section 775.089, see § 924.07(l)(k), Fla.Stat. (1993), enacted effective October 1, 1993, ch. 93-37, § 14, at 206, Laws of Fla., there is no comparable provision in sections 39.069(l)(b) and 39.0711, Florida Statutes (1993), which list the types of orders from which the state may appeal in juvenile proceedings. The holding of State v. MacLeod, 600 So.2d 1096, 1098 (Fla.1992), that the failure to order restitution does not constitute an illegal sentence, precludes jurisdiction under section 39.069(l)(b)5, which allows the state to appeal the disposition in a juvenile proceeding on the ground that it is illegal. None of the other grounds apply. Consequently, this court has no jurisdiction to consider the instant appeal.

GLICKSTEIN, STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

662 So. 2d 768, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11965, 1995 WL 676079, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cw-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack