State v. Cutner

Montana Supreme Court

State v. Cutner

230 Mont. 16

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Cutner. Read the opinion of the Court — 214 Mont. 189 →

Montana Supreme Court·Decided May 8, 1987·No. No. CDC-83-092b·Published

Opinion

DECISION

The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence for Count I, Sexual Assault, 20 years; Count II, Burglary, 10 years to be served concurrently and the Petitioner was designated as non-dangerous for parole eligibility imposed on March 16, 1984, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that: the sentence shall remain the same as originally imposed.

We wish to thank Paul Ewers of the Montana Defender Project for his assistance to the Defendant and to this Court.

SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION Frank M. Davis, Chairman, Thomas Honzel, Douglas Harkin, Judges.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION

The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence for Count I, Sexual Assault, 20 years; Count II, Burglary, 10 years to be served concurrently and the Petitioner was designated as non-dangerous for parole eligibility imposed on March 16, 1984, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that: the sentence shall remain the same as originally imposed.

We wish to thank Paul Ewers of the Montana Defender Project for his assistance to the Defendant and to this Court.

SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION Frank M. Davis, Chairman, Thomas Honzel, Douglas Harkin, Judges.

State v. Cutner, 230 Mont. 16 (Mo. 1987).

Pincite

230 Mont. 16 (State v. Cutner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.