State v. Cutner

Montana Supreme Court

State v. Cutner

230 Mont. 16

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedMay 8, 1987

DocketNo. CDC-83-092b

StatusPublished

This text of 230 Mont. 16 (State v. Cutner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Cutner, 230 Mont. 16 (Mo. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

DECISION

The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence for Count I, Sexual Assault, 20 years; Count II, Burglary, 10 years to be served concurrently and the Petitioner was designated as non-dangerous for parole eligibility imposed on March 16, 1984, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that: the sentence shall remain the same as originally imposed.

We wish to thank Paul Ewers of the Montana Defender Project for his assistance to the Defendant and to this Court.

SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION Frank M. Davis, Chairman, Thomas Honzel, Douglas Harkin, Judges.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION

The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence for Count I, Sexual Assault, 20 years; Count II, Burglary, 10 years to be served concurrently and the Petitioner was designated as non-dangerous for parole eligibility imposed on March 16, 1984, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that: the sentence shall remain the same as originally imposed.

We wish to thank Paul Ewers of the Montana Defender Project for his assistance to the Defendant and to this Court.

SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION Frank M. Davis, Chairman, Thomas Honzel, Douglas Harkin, Judges.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 Mont. 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cutner-mont-1987.