State v. Custodio
17 A.3d 70, 300 Conn. 934, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 145
This text of 17 A.3d 70 (State v. Custodio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Custodio, 17 A.3d 70, 300 Conn. 934, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 145 (Colo. 2011).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 126 Conn. App. 539 (AC 32527), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that General Statutes § 54-56d, as amended by Public Acts 1998, No. 98-88, § 2, applied retroactively?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court had properly exercised in personam jurisdiction over the defendant, when it was conceded that the defendant had no notice of the proceeding which resulted in an arrest warrant for failure to appear?
“3. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering periodic competency exams when there was no possibility that the defendant will ever regain competence?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Custodio
13 A.3d 1119 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
17 A.3d 70, 300 Conn. 934, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-custodio-conn-2011.