State v. Cushingberry

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Cushingberry

382 S.W.3d 243, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1371, 2012 WL 5306347

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 30, 2012·No. No. WD 73799·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Michael Cushingberry appeals from the judgment following a bench trial to the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, [244] finding him guilty of murder in the second degree and armed criminal action. On appeal, Mr. Cushingberry argues that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting evidence of prior uncharged crimes over his objection and plainly erred in admitting evidence of Mr. Cushingberry’s reputation for violence. Finding no error, we affirm in this per curiam order and have provided the parties a memorandum of law setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

Michael Cushingberry appeals from the judgment following a bench trial to the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, [244] finding him guilty of murder in the second degree and armed criminal action. On appeal, Mr. Cushingberry argues that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting evidence of prior uncharged crimes over his objection and plainly erred in admitting evidence of Mr. Cushingberry’s reputation for violence. Finding no error, we affirm in this per curiam order and have provided the parties a memorandum of law setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Cushingberry, 382 S.W.3d 243, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1371, 2012 WL 5306347 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

382 S.W.3d 243 (State v. Cushingberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.