State v. Curtis

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Curtis

301 S.W.3d 132, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 27, 2010 WL 173294

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 19, 2010

DocketED 92479

StatusPublished

This text of 301 S.W.3d 132 (State v. Curtis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Curtis, 301 S.W.3d 132, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 27, 2010 WL 173294 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Dennis Curtis, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of murder in the first degree, in violation of section 565.020 RSMo (2000); attempted robbery in the first degree, in violation of sections 564.011 and 569.020 RSMo (2000); and two counts of armed criminal action, in violation of *133 section 571.015 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a prior offender and sentenced him to life imprisonment on the murder count and fifteen years imprisonment on the attempted robbery count, to be served consecutively, and life imprisonment on each of the armed criminal action counts, to be served concurrently with each other and with the other sentences.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Dennis Curtis, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of murder in the first degree, in violation of section 565.020 RSMo (2000); attempted robbery in the first degree, in violation of sections 564.011 and 569.020 RSMo (2000); and two counts of armed criminal action, in violation of *133 section 571.015 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a prior offender and sentenced him to life imprisonment on the murder count and fifteen years imprisonment on the attempted robbery count, to be served consecutively, and life imprisonment on each of the armed criminal action counts, to be served concurrently with each other and with the other sentences.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

301 S.W.3d 132, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 27, 2010 WL 173294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-curtis-moctapp-2010.