State v. Curtis

531 A.2d 674, 1987 Me. LEXIS 809
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedOctober 9, 1987
StatusPublished

This text of 531 A.2d 674 (State v. Curtis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Curtis, 531 A.2d 674, 1987 Me. LEXIS 809 (Me. 1987).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Richard Curtis appeals from the denial by the Superior Court (Somerset County) of his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. We conclude that the Superior Court was not clearly erroneous in finding that Curtis had failed to show the probability of a different result if on retrial the Court learned of the recantation. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. See State v. Pierce, 438 A.2d 247, 253 (Me.1981).

The entry must be:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Pierce
438 A.2d 247 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
531 A.2d 674, 1987 Me. LEXIS 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-curtis-me-1987.