State v. Curtin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Curtin

35 So. 485, 111 La. 129, 1903 La. LEXIS 507

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedDecember 14, 1903

DocketNo. 14,979

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 35 So. 485 (State v. Curtin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Curtin, 35 So. 485, 111 La. 129, 1903 La. LEXIS 507 (La. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

MONROE, J.

This case has been submitted without argument, and no briefs have been filed. We find in the record a motion in arrest of judgment, in which it is said that the information upon which the defendant was convicted is defective on its face, in that it charges the defendant with having “assaulted Mrs. W. E. Livaudais with intent to rob her of two dollars and a poeketbook, the property of Mr. W. E. Livaudais,” which is, in effect, to charge him with an assault upon one person with intent to rob another.

The information charges that the defendant willfully “did attempt to rob from the person of one Mrs. W. E. Livaudais the sum of two dollars and fifty cents, lawful currency of the United States,' of the goods and property of W. E. Livaudais, by thrusting his hand into the pocket of the said Mrs. W. E. Livaudais.”

This is in the language of the statute, and is sufficient. Rev. St. §’ 811.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MONROE, J.

This case has been submitted without argument, and no briefs have been filed. We find in the record a motion in arrest of judgment, in which it is said that the information upon which the defendant was convicted is defective on its face, in that it charges the defendant with having “assaulted Mrs. W. E. Livaudais with intent to rob her of two dollars and a poeketbook, the property of Mr. W. E. Livaudais,” which is, in effect, to charge him with an assault upon one person with intent to rob another.

The information charges that the defendant willfully “did attempt to rob from the person of one Mrs. W. E. Livaudais the sum of two dollars and fifty cents, lawful currency of the United States,' of the goods and property of W. E. Livaudais, by thrusting his hand into the pocket of the said Mrs. W. E. Livaudais.”

This is in the language of the statute, and is sufficient. Rev. St. §’ 811.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 So. 485, 111 La. 129, 1903 La. LEXIS 507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-curtin-la-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack