State v. Curry
This text of 533 S.W.2d 687 (State v. Curry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant’s single point is, “The court erred in failing to sustain defendant’s challenge for cause of the venireman Hale.” This utterly fails to comply with Rule 84.-04(d) [made applicable to criminal cases by Rule 28.18] in that there is no statement as to wherein and why the ruling of the court is claimed to be erroneous. Counsel should note the relevant remarks of Simeone, J., in L. L. v. V. F. L. and M. D. S., Inc., [Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District, No. 37,061, decided January 20,1976], relating to dismissal for improper briefing.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
533 S.W.2d 687, 1976 Mo. App. LEXIS 2403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-curry-moctapp-1976.