State v. Currier

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. Currier

504 A.2d 617, 1986 Me. LEXIS 668

DecidedFebruary 6, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 504 A.2d 617 (State v. Currier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Currier, 504 A.2d 617, 1986 Me. LEXIS 668 (Me. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Asserting insufficiency of the evidence, Daniel H. Currier appeals his conviction in Superior Court, Somerset County, of burglary and theft (17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 401 and 353 (1983)). The record discloses that Currier was apprehended in the immediate vicinity of the burglarized building and in close proximity to articles removed therefrom in circumstances warranting a rational conclusion beyond a reasonable doubt that he was guilty as charged. That evidence was sufficient.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI