State v. Curley
184 S.E.2d 80, 257 S.C. 68, 1971 S.C. LEXIS 211
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Curley. Read the opinion of the Court — 253 S.C. 513 →
Opinion
[69]*69ORDER
It having been determined by the Circuit Court, after an evidentiary hearing conforming with the judgment of this Court heretofore filed (253 S. C. 513, 171 S. E. (2d) 699), that the appellant, Pearson, after receiving the benefit of the procedural safeguards required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed. (2d) 694, with respect to the evidence admitted against him, voluntarily and intelligently waived his privilege against self-incrimination, said appellant’s conviction is, therefore, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Curley, 184 S.E.2d 80, 257 S.C. 68, 1971 S.C. LEXIS 211 (S.C. 1971).
184 S.E.2d 80 (State v. Curley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miranda v. Arizona
384 U.S. 436 (Supreme Court, 1966)
State v. Curley
171 S.E.2d 699 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1970)