State v. Curley

Supreme Court of South Carolina

State v. Curley

184 S.E.2d 80, 257 S.C. 68, 1971 S.C. LEXIS 211

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedOctober 20, 1971

Docket19002

StatusPublished

This text of 184 S.E.2d 80 (State v. Curley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Curley, 184 S.E.2d 80, 257 S.C. 68, 1971 S.C. LEXIS 211 (S.C. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

[69]*69ORDER

Per Curiam :

It having been determined by the Circuit Court, after an evidentiary hearing conforming with the judgment of this Court heretofore filed (253 S. C. 513, 171 S. E. (2d) 699), that the appellant, Pearson, after receiving the benefit of the procedural safeguards required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed. (2d) 694, with respect to the evidence admitted against him, voluntarily and intelligently waived his privilege against self-incrimination, said appellant’s conviction is, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[69]*69ORDER

Per Curiam :

It having been determined by the Circuit Court, after an evidentiary hearing conforming with the judgment of this Court heretofore filed (253 S. C. 513, 171 S. E. (2d) 699), that the appellant, Pearson, after receiving the benefit of the procedural safeguards required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed. (2d) 694, with respect to the evidence admitted against him, voluntarily and intelligently waived his privilege against self-incrimination, said appellant’s conviction is, therefore, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 S.E.2d 80, 257 S.C. 68, 1971 S.C. LEXIS 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-curley-sc-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack