State v. Cunningham

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Cunningham

921 N.E.2d 1071, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1486

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 23, 2010·No. 2010-0154·Published

Opinion

Wood App. No. WD-08-063, 2009-Ohio-6970. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of the court that the appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due February 16, 2010, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood App. No. WD-08-063, 2009-Ohio-6970. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of the court that the appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due February 16, 2010, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.

State v. Cunningham, 921 N.E.2d 1071, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1486 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

921 N.E.2d 1071 (State v. Cunningham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.