State v. Cunningham

823 N.E.2d 875, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1456

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Cunningham. Read the opinion of the Court — 105 Ohio St. 3d 197 →

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 4, 2005·No. 2002-1377·Published

Opinion

Allen C.P. No. CR2002-0010. This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of a motion for stay of execution pending the filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay of execution be, and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that compliance with the mandate and the execution of sentence be, and hereby are, stayed, pending the timely filing of the petition in the Supreme Court of the United States.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if such petition is timely filed, this stay shall continue for an indefinite period pending the final disposition of this cause by the Supreme Court of the United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay of execution be, and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that compliance with the mandate and the execution of sentence be, and hereby are, stayed, pending the timely filing of the petition in the Supreme Court of the United States.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if such petition is timely filed, this stay shall continue for an indefinite period pending the final disposition of this cause by the Supreme Court of the United States.

State v. Cunningham, 823 N.E.2d 875, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1456 (Ohio 2005).

Pincite

823 N.E.2d 875 (State v. Cunningham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.