State v. Cumpton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Cumpton

1 N.C. 67

DecidedJune 15, 1800

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 67 (State v. Cumpton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Cumpton, 1 N.C. 67 (N.C. 1800).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam—

The Superior Court has jurisdiction of the offence charged in the indictment, and on the finding of the Jury, there ought to be judgment for the State. Judgment for the State.

Judge Johnston

observed in this cafe, that the defendant might have pleaded that the assault charged, was a common assault, and traversed the intent to murder, that therefore the Court had not jurisdiction, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam—

The Superior Court has jurisdiction of the offence charged in the indictment, and on the finding of the Jury, there ought to be judgment for the State. Judgment for the State.

Judge Johnston

observed in this cafe, that the defendant might have pleaded that the assault charged, was a common assault, and traversed the intent to murder, that therefore the Court had not jurisdiction, &c.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.C. 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cumpton-nc-1800.