State v. . Cummings

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Cummings

28 S.E.2d 100, 223 N.C. 861, 1943 N.C. LEXIS 177

DecidedDecember 15, 1943

StatusPublished

This text of 28 S.E.2d 100 (State v. . Cummings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Cummings, 28 S.E.2d 100, 223 N.C. 861, 1943 N.C. LEXIS 177 (N.C. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant was convicted of an assault on a female, Lilly May Deese, and appealed to this Court, assigning error.

We have given careful attention to the exceptions presented on the appeal, and do not find any of sufficient merit to justify interference with the result of the trial. The exceptions, while carefully prepared and ably presented, involve no novel principles of law, and we have deemed it unnecessary to write an opinion.

We find

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant was convicted of an assault on a female, Lilly May Deese, and appealed to this Court, assigning error.

We have given careful attention to the exceptions presented on the appeal, and do not find any of sufficient merit to justify interference with the result of the trial. The exceptions, while carefully prepared and ably presented, involve no novel principles of law, and we have deemed it unnecessary to write an opinion.

We find

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 S.E.2d 100, 223 N.C. 861, 1943 N.C. LEXIS 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cummings-nc-1943.