State v. . Cummings
28 S.E.2d 100, 223 N.C. 861, 1943 N.C. LEXIS 177
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of an assault on a female, Lilly May Deese, and appealed to this Court, assigning error.
We have given careful attention to the exceptions presented on the appeal, and do not find any of sufficient merit to justify interference with the result of the trial. The exceptions, while carefully prepared and ably presented, involve no novel principles of law, and we have deemed it unnecessary to write an opinion.
We find
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. . Cummings, 28 S.E.2d 100, 223 N.C. 861, 1943 N.C. LEXIS 177 (N.C. 1943).
28 S.E.2d 100 (State v. . Cummings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.