State v. Culley
This text of 899 P.2d 732 (State v. Culley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals from multiple convictions for sexual crimes and from his convictions for solicitation to commit, murder and conspiracy to commit murder. The cases were consolidated for sentencing and defendant also appeals his sentences. We find no error in defendant’s assignments regarding his convictions for sexual crimes and write only to address his assignment that the trial court erred in convicting him on both the solicitation and conspiracy charges.
The state concedes that defendant was improperly convicted of both conspiracy and solicitation to commit murder based on the same conduct. ORS 161.485(2). We accept the concession. The state says that the judgment should reflect only a conviction for solicitation to commit murder. Defendant does not contend otherwise.
Judgment in CA A76983 affirmed; in CA A76984, conviction for conspiracy to commit murder vacated; conviction for solicitation to commit murder affirmed and remanded for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
899 P.2d 732, 135 Or. App. 536, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1035, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-culley-orctapp-1995.