State v. C.S.

647 So. 2d 844, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 21, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 2, 1995 WL 2424
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 5, 1995·No. No. 83939·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We have for review C.S. v. State, 638 So.2d 212 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), based on certified conflict with B.H. v. State, 622 So.2d 615 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993), aff'd in part, 645 So.2d 987 (Fla.1994). We have jurisdiction, art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const., quash the decision below, and remand for reconsideration in light of B.H.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., OVERTON and WELLS, JJ., and McDONALD, Senior Justice, concur. HARDING, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with an opinion. KOGAN, J., dissents with an opinion, in which SHAW, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. C.S., 647 So. 2d 844, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 21, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 2, 1995 WL 2424 (Fla. 1995).

647 So. 2d 844 (State v. C.S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

B.H. v. State
622 So. 2d 615 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
C.S. v. State
638 So. 2d 212 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
B.H. v. State
645 So. 2d 987 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)