State v. Cruz
This text of 2024 ND 203 (State v. Cruz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2024 ND 203
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Lucio Cruz, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20240099
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Lindsey R. Nieuwsma, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Dennis H. Ingold, Assistant State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; on brief.
Alexander S. Kelsch, Mandan, ND, for defendant and appellant; on brief. State v. Cruz No. 20240099
[¶1] Lucio Cruz appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted him of aggravated assault, a class C felony. Cruz argues insufficient evidence exists to support the verdict. After reviewing the record, we conclude substantial evidence supports the verdict. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr Daniel S. El-Dweek, D.J.
[¶3] The Honorable Daniel S. El-Dweek, D.J., sitting in place of Crothers, J., disqualified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2024 ND 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cruz-nd-2024.